Skip to main content
· 1/18/1996

Addison v. Burnett

Citations

  • 41 Cal. App. 4th 1288
  • 49 Cal. Rptr. 2d 132
  • 96 Daily Journal DAR 634
  • 96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 404
  • 28 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 1076
  • 1996 Cal. App. LEXIS 38

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “In our view, the amendment was intended to clarify the process of determining the nature of these contracts, not to change the substance of the law.”
  • “The remaining factors [defendant] cites to support a characterization as a security agreement — his payment of sales tax, insurance, licensing and registration fees, as well as his assumption of the risk of loss or damage — are no longer considered controlling.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Elia

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.