· 1/18/1996
Addison v. Burnett
Citations
- 41 Cal. App. 4th 1288
- 49 Cal. Rptr. 2d 132
- 96 Daily Journal DAR 634
- 96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 404
- 28 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 1076
- 1996 Cal. App. LEXIS 38
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “In our view, the amendment was intended to clarify the process of determining the nature of these contracts, not to change the substance of the law.”
- “The remaining factors [defendant] cites to support a characterization as a security agreement — his payment of sales tax, insurance, licensing and registration fees, as well as his assumption of the risk of loss or damage — are no longer considered controlling.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Elia
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.