Aday v. U. S. District Court

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• applying the doctrine to a state tort law claim brought by a Guard Technician and allegedly related to his civilian duties
• relying on Johnson with reference to a suit by a Guard Technician
• treating the Feres doctrine as a limit on the court’s jurisdiction
• “the district court concluded that [plaintiff’s] claims arose from conduct in the workplace.... [and] it is clear from the record that the off-base, after-hours harassment was merely an extension of on-base events”
• Alaskan Guard member sues the Guard superiors for a longrunning pattern of harassment, intimidation, and interference
• court has no subject matter jurisdiction over Feres barred FTCA claims

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).