Skip to main content
· 11/27/2001

Adarand Constructors, Inc. v. Mineta

Citations

  • 534 U.S. 103
  • 122 S. Ct. 511
  • 151 L. Ed. 2d 489
  • 2001 U.S. LEXIS 10814
  • 15 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 15
  • 2001 Daily Journal DAR 12363
  • 70 U.S.L.W. 4025
  • 2001 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 9903
  • 81 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 40,777
  • 87 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 321

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a court may dismiss sua sponte for lack of subject matter jurisdiction even if no party raises the issue
  • \We are obliged to examine standing sua sponte where standing has erroneously been assumed below.\ (citation omitted)
  • \We are obliged to examine standing sua sponte where standing has erroneously been assumed below.\
  • “We are obliged to examine standing sua sponte where standing has erroneously been assumed below.”
  • “[T]he importance of an issue should not distort the principles that control the exercise of our jurisdiction.”
  • “[T]his is a court of final review and not first view . . . .”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.