· 11/27/2001
Adarand Constructors, Inc. v. Mineta
Citations
- 534 U.S. 103
- 122 S. Ct. 511
- 151 L. Ed. 2d 489
- 2001 U.S. LEXIS 10814
- 15 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 15
- 2001 Daily Journal DAR 12363
- 70 U.S.L.W. 4025
- 2001 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 9903
- 81 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 40,777
- 87 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 321
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that a court may dismiss sua sponte for lack of subject matter jurisdiction even if no party raises the issue
- \We are obliged to examine standing sua sponte where standing has erroneously been assumed below.\ (citation omitted)
- \We are obliged to examine standing sua sponte where standing has erroneously been assumed below.\
- “We are obliged to examine standing sua sponte where standing has erroneously been assumed below.”
- “[T]he importance of an issue should not distort the principles that control the exercise of our jurisdiction.”
- “[T]his is a court of final review and not first view . . . .”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Per Curiam
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.