Adams v. Vaill

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• \[i]t cannot be doubted that courts have inherent power to change or modify their own injunctions [when] circumstances or pertinent law have so changed as to make it equitable to do so\
• “[i]t cannot be doubted that courts have inherent power to change or modify their own injunctions [when] circumstances or pertinent law have so changed as to make it equitable to do so”
• “courts have inherent power to change or modify their own injunctions where circumstances or pertinent law have so changed as to make it equitable to do so”
• “courts have inherent power to change or modify their own injunctions where circumstances or pertinent law have so changed as to make it equitable to do so”
• “courts have inherent power to change or modify their own injunctions where circumstances or pertinent law have so changed as to make it equitable to do so” [emphasis added]
• ‘[i]t cannot be doubted that courts have inherent power to change or modify their own injunctions where circumstances or pertinent law have so changed as to make it equitable to do so’

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).