Adams v. The City of Raleigh

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that “§ 4.59 employs conditional language that must be read in conjunction with the appropriate DC to be understood”
• remanded for the Board to make the appropriate factual findings to properly address the legal question under 38 C.F.R. 3.321
• 38 C.F.R. § 4.59 is limited by the diagnostic code applicable to the claimant's disability, and is read in conjunction with, and subject to, the relevant diagnostic code
• 38 C.F.R. § 4.59 is limited by the diagnostic code applicable to the claimant's disability, and is read in conjunction with, and subject to, the relevant diagnostic code
• “The rating schedule must be deemed inadequate before extraschedular consideration is warranted.”
• \The rating schedule must be deemed inadequate before extraschedular consideration is warranted.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).