Adams v. Texas State Board of Chiropractic Examiners

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the presumption that the legislature intended to change rather than amend a law is not overcome where the amendment merely recites courts' prior interpretations of the statute and where another section of the statute already contained similar language
• holding that the presumption that the legislature intended to change rather than amend a law is not overcome where the amendment merely recites courts’ prior interpretations of the statute and where another section of the statute already contained similar language
• holding that the presumption that the legislature intended to change rather than amend a law is not overcome where the amendment merely recites courts' prior interpretations of the statute and where another section of the statute already contained similar language
• holding that the presumption that the legislature intended to change rather than amend a law is not overcome where the amendment merely recites courts’ prior interpretations of the statute and where another section of the statute already contained similar language
• holding that the presumption that the legislature intended to change rather than amend a law is not overcome where the amendment merely recites courts' prior interpretations of the statute and where another section of the statute already contained similar language
• finding existing laws when Texas Constitution was adopted in 1876 did not provide for jury trial of physician’s license revocation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).