Adams v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that even when circumstantial evidence “strongly suggests guilt” it is- insufficient to prove grand theft when the State fails to present evidence inconsistent with a reasonable hypothesis of innocence
• recognizing that even when circumstantial evidence \strongly suggests guilt\ it is insufficient to prove grand theft when the State fails to present evidence inconsistent -4- with a reasonable hypothesis of innocence
• holding no inference permitted where defendant arrested “nearby” truck, taken from repair location without payment, absent any showing that defendant moved it

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Midgette v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2014-12-05· cited 2×
• A.D.P. v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2017-07-14· cited 2×
• Waldron v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-04-25· cited 1×

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Law
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1989-07-27· cited 545×
• Z.S. v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1991-05-22· cited 3×