Skip to main content
Supreme Court· 6/9/1913

Adams v. Russell

Citations

  • 229 U.S. 353
  • 33 S. Ct. 846
  • 57 L. Ed. 1224
  • 1913 U.S. LEXIS 2450

Syllabus

<p>This court will not review the judgment of the state court when it rests not only on Federal, but also on non-Federal grounds, and the latter are sufficient to sustain it and wore necessarily decided.</p> <p>Whether state officers have power to grant a parole under a state indeterminate sentence act, and under what conditions, are for the state court to finally determine.</p> <p>The state court having held* that, under the applicable statutes, the parole granted to a prisoner was absolutely void and was therefore properly vacated, such ground is sufficient to sustain the judgment, and this court cannot review it on the asserted Federal question that Ihe state officers had vacated the parole in such manner as to violate the prisoner’s constitutional rights secured by the Fourteenth Amendment.</p> <p>Whether a state statute allowing prisoners a reduction for “good time” is part of an indeterminate sentence act is for the state court to determine, and in this case it is a substantial local question on which to rest the judgment of the state court.</p>

Judges: McKenna

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Adams v. Russell

3 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.