Adams v. Randolph

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that the EIS should \go beyond mere assertions\ and should devote substantial treatment to \all reasonable alternatives\
• stating that the EIS should “go beyond mere assertions” and should devote substantial treatment to “all reasonable alternatives”
• noting that consideration need only be given to reasonable alternatives
• \The Secretary is free to choose among alternatives which cause substantially equal damage to parks or historic sites.\
• “The Secretary is free to choose among alternatives which cause substantially equal damage to parks or historic sites.”
• “[A] route which does minimize harm can still be rejected if it is infeasible or imprudent.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).