Supreme Court· 5/23/1932
Adams v. Mills
Citations
- 286 U.S. 397
- 52 S. Ct. 589
- 76 L. Ed. 1184
- 1932 U.S. LEXIS 820
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “In contemplation of law the claim for damages arose at the time the extra charge was paid.”
- reparations ordered constituted difference between one filed rate and another
- “Neither the fact of subsequent reimbursement by the plaintiffs from funds of the shippers, nor the disposition which may hereafter be made of the damages recovered, is of any concern to the wrongdoers.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Brandéis, Butler, Act
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.