Skip to main content

Adams v. Leidholt

Citations

  • 579 P.2d 618
  • 195 Colo. 450

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • even though defendant doctor had not filed a cross-appeal arguing the statute of limitations, court would permit such argument because the defendant is entitled to raise “any legal theory in support of the trial court’s judgment”
  • even though defendant doctor had not filed a cross-appeal arguing the statute of limitations, court would permit such argument because the defendant is entitled to raise \any legal theory in support of the trial court's judgment\
  • adopting the \captain of the ship\ doctrine

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Carrigan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

15 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.