· 6/19/1978
Adams v. Leidholt
Citations
- 579 P.2d 618
- 195 Colo. 450
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- even though defendant doctor had not filed a cross-appeal arguing the statute of limitations, court would permit such argument because the defendant is entitled to raise “any legal theory in support of the trial court’s judgment”
- even though defendant doctor had not filed a cross-appeal arguing the statute of limitations, court would permit such argument because the defendant is entitled to raise \any legal theory in support of the trial court's judgment\
- adopting the \captain of the ship\ doctrine
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Carrigan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.