Skip to main content
· 4/19/1984

Adams v. Jonathan Woodner Co.

Citations

  • 475 A.2d 393
  • 1984 D.C. App. LEXIS 383

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[A] judgment based upon [issue preclusion] or [claim preclusion] is no longer valid when the decision upon which the court relied in applying either of the doctrines has been reversed.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: MacK, Terry, Yeagley

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.