Adams v. Hartconn Associates, Inc. (In Re Adams)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding laches bars a claim for damages for violation of the automatic stay because of nineteen-month delay in filing motion to reopen
• holding laches bars a claim for damages for violation of the automatic stay because of nineteen-month delay in filing motion to reopen
• “Nothing would be achieved by recovering payment to a secured creditor who in any event is entitled to the payment ahead of other creditors.”
• \[N]othing would be achieved by recovering payment to a secured creditor who in any event is entitled to the payment ahead of other creditors.\
• debtor is time-barred from pursuing a claim for damages for violation of the automatic stay because the debtor waited nineteen months to file a motion to reopen
• based on the totality of the circumstances, including a nineteen-month delay in bringing the action, the court concluded that the debtor was barred from recovering for the stay violation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).