Adams v. Greiner

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that conviction was final under Section 2244(d)(1)(A) at the conclusion of direct review and that a 440.10 motion filed within one year of the date the conviction became final tolled the period of limitations under Section 2244(d)(2)
• “Petitioner’s contention that a motion to dismiss, as opposed to an answer, is an improper response to the petition is without merit.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).