· 2/22/1978
Adams v. Clarendon County School District No. 2
Citations
- 241 S.E.2d 897
- 270 S.C. 266
- 1978 S.C. LEXIS 469
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- commenting that in interpreting statutes, the court \must be mindful of the principle that the intention of the legislature is the primary guideline\
- determining that statutory section cannot be read in isolation or interpreted so as to ignore or conflict with other provisions of the statute
- “It is the duty of this Court to give all parts and provisions of a legislative enactment effect and reconcile conflicts if reasonably and logically possible.”
- \It is the duty of this Court to give all parts and provisions of a legislative enactment effect and reconcile conflicts if reasonably and logically possible.\
- whether termination of Adam’s employment was subj ect to the provisions of § 59-25-430 which allows dismissal at any time for evident unfitness for teaching or § 59-25-440 which provides for notice of possible dismissal and reasonable time for improvement.
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Per Curiam
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.