Skip to main content
· 2/22/1978

Adams v. Clarendon County School District No. 2

Citations

  • 241 S.E.2d 897
  • 270 S.C. 266
  • 1978 S.C. LEXIS 469

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • commenting that in interpreting statutes, the court \must be mindful of the principle that the intention of the legislature is the primary guideline\
  • determining that statutory section cannot be read in isolation or interpreted so as to ignore or conflict with other provisions of the statute
  • “It is the duty of this Court to give all parts and provisions of a legislative enactment effect and reconcile conflicts if reasonably and logically possible.”
  • \It is the duty of this Court to give all parts and provisions of a legislative enactment effect and reconcile conflicts if reasonably and logically possible.\
  • whether termination of Adam’s employment was subj ect to the provisions of § 59-25-430 which allows dismissal at any time for evident unfitness for teaching or § 59-25-440 which provides for notice of possible dismissal and reasonable time for improvement.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.