Adams v. City of Des Moines

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding error was not preserved on as-applied constitutional challenge to statute urged in district court and on appeal, even though district court determined statute applied to defendant
• concluding error was not preserved on as-applied constitutional challenge to statute urged in district court and on appeal, even though district court determined statute applied to defendant
• concluding error was not preserved on as-applied constitutional challenge to statute urged in district court and on appeal, even though district court determined statute applied to defendant
• giving broad interpretation to section 670.4(11), relying on “this court’s application of a companion exception in Baker v. City of Ottumwa, 560 N.W.2d 578 (Iowa 1997),” where we held the language of that section “created a very broad classification of claims”
• analyzing the “emergency response” exemption

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).