Adams v. Cal-Ark International, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that EEOC charge was received by the EEOC on January 28, 2000, because that was the date on which the letter enclosing the charge was stamped “received”
• explaining the difference between deferral and non-deferral states

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).