· 2/27/1991
Adams v. Blue Cross/Blue Shield of Maryland, Inc.
Citations
- 757 F. Supp. 661
- 13 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1608
- 1991 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2330
- 1991 WL 24302
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that while grant of power to deny benefits arguably confers interpretive discretion, absent clear and unequivocal language no such discretion will be inferred
- critical of the probative value of Dr. Eddy’s testimony in a case involving insurance coverage for HDCABMT
- use of protocol does not mean that treatment is experimental
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Garbis
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.