Adams v. BAPTIST MEMORIAL HOSPITAL-DESOTO

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “notwithstanding” language in a subsection of a state statute overrode a specifically identified conflicting subsection
• defining “notwithstanding” to mean “(1) In spite of; (2) Nevertheless; (3) In spite of the fact that”
• \[T]he only proper venue for a suit against medical providers is the county in which the alleged act or omission occurred.\
• “[T]he only proper venue for a suit against medical providers is the county in which the alleged act or omission occurred.”
• “The presence of medical providers in [an] action renders subsection (1) inapplicable, as the ‘notwithstanding’ language of subsection (3) negates the language of subsection (1).”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).