Skip to main content
· 3/15/1909

Adams v. Bank of Meadville

Citations

  • 94 Miss. 595
  • 48 So. 831

Syllabus

<p>Receivers. Attaching creditors. Priority.</p> <p>Where an attaching creditor, after judgment in his favor, moved the chancery court for an order directing its receiver, having custody of the attached and other property of the defendant, to pay his debt or release the property attached, it was,not error to deny his motion, in the absence of all evidence touching liens thereon in favor of other creditors, although the attachment was levied before the receiver was appointed.</p>

Judges: Fletcher

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.