Skip to main content
· 6/30/2020

Adams v. Bank of America

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding LUPA's exhaustion requirement does not bar tort claims arising from improper governmental delay in processing permits
  • “a damage claim may still be controlled by LUPA if it is dependent on ‘an interpretative decision regarding the application of a zoning ordinance.’”
  • “Shareholders are usually not allowed to bring an individual direct cause of action for an injury inflicted on the corporation or its property by a third party.” (citations omitted)
  • “Shareholders are usually not allowed to bring an individual direct cause of action 7 for an injury inflicted upon the corporation or its property by a third party.” (emphasis added)
  • “While improper purpose and improper means are 8 separate inquiries, ‘impropriety may be more easily found if the means of interference 9 was wrongful.’” (quoting Pleas, 774 P.2d at 1164)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.