· 6/30/2020
Adams v. Bank of America
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding LUPA's exhaustion requirement does not bar tort claims arising from improper governmental delay in processing permits
- “a damage claim may still be controlled by LUPA if it is dependent on ‘an interpretative decision regarding the application of a zoning ordinance.’”
- “Shareholders are usually not allowed to bring an individual direct cause of action for an injury inflicted on the corporation or its property by a third party.” (citations omitted)
- “Shareholders are usually not allowed to bring an individual direct cause of action 7 for an injury inflicted upon the corporation or its property by a third party.” (emphasis added)
- “While improper purpose and improper means are 8 separate inquiries, ‘impropriety may be more easily found if the means of interference 9 was wrongful.’” (quoting Pleas, 774 P.2d at 1164)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.