Adams v. Amore

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that trial court erred in admitting expert testimony regarding characteristics of “whistle blower”
• “The function of an expert witness is to provide testimony on subjects that are beyond the common sense, experience and education of the average juror.”
• function of expert witness is to provide testimony 10 on subjects beyond common sense, experience, or education of average person, and expert testimony is inappropriate if jury can determine issue without such testimony

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).