Adams Laboratories, Inc., Cross-Appellant v. Jacobs Engineering Co., Inc., Cross-Appellee

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding reference to the comparative size and financial wealth of the parties was improper
• remanding case for new trial due to the cumulative effect of misconduct of attorney for the prevailing party
• “references to the relative wealth of the defendants in contrast to the relative poverty of the plaintiffs” are improper
• counsel's reference to chemical plant's bankruptcy, which was in direct contravention of ruling in limine, along with other errors constituted prejudicial error which entitled party to new trial

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).