Adams Express Co. v. Hundley

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that evidence of reports and “internal debates within the carriers about the increases[] indicates” they “had a good deal of time to react to competitors’ moves and consider their own,” suggesting independent action
• “[T]he time elapsed between the [price] increases,” seven months, three months, and two months, among other evidence, was “as equally suggestive of independent action as collusion,” if not “more suggestive of independent action.”
• denying spoliation sanctions where spoliation claim was based on speculation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).