Skip to main content
· 5/5/2005

Adams Ex Rel. Adams v. City of Westminster

Citations

  • 140 P.3d 8
  • 22 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 1726
  • 2005 Colo. App. LEXIS 675
  • 2005 WL 1038977

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the CGIA was intended to apply when the claimant seeks redress from injuries that result from tortious conduct
  • \eases interpreting the [CJGIA generally support the view that governmental immunity is immunity from actions seeking compensatory damages for personal harms or injuries\
  • “[I]nterlocutory appeals under § 24-10-108 are limited to determining issues of sovereign immunity. Determining merits-based issues would expand the nature of appellate review beyond that mandated by statute.”
  • plaintiff's claims for breach of contract and promissory estoppel were not barred by CGIA, where plaintiff could not show that city breached a duty imposed by law to protect all citizens from risk of harm

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Casebolt, Dailey, Kapelke

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.