· 7/28/2000
Adams County Regional Water District and Adams County Water Company, Inc. v. Village of Manchester, Ohio and Village of West Union, Ohio
Citations
- 226 F.3d 513
- 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 18128
- 2000 WL 1050916
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that 1926(b) \should be given a liberal interpretation that protects rural water associations indebted to the FmHA from municipal encroachment\
- “Construing § 1926(b) liberally, as this Court is required to do, see Wayne, 36 F.3d at 527, it is not necessary that Manchester actually annex or attempt to physically include West Union in its municipality in order for curtailment to be found.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Merritt, Clay, Heyburn
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.