Skip to main content
· 7/28/2000

Adams County Regional Water District and Adams County Water Company, Inc. v. Village of Manchester, Ohio and Village of West Union, Ohio

Citations

  • 226 F.3d 513
  • 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 18128
  • 2000 WL 1050916

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that 1926(b) \should be given a liberal interpretation that protects rural water associations indebted to the FmHA from municipal encroachment\
  • “Construing § 1926(b) liberally, as this Court is required to do, see Wayne, 36 F.3d at 527, it is not necessary that Manchester actually annex or attempt to physically include West Union in its municipality in order for curtailment to be found.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Merritt, Clay, Heyburn

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.