Skip to main content
· 3/3/2011

Adamar of New Jersey, Inc. v. August (In Re August)

Citations

  • 448 B.R. 331
  • 2011 Bankr. LEXIS 1150
  • 2011 WL 1206146

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that the purpose of a player’s card is to track the gambler’s betting history and that casinos “comp” a gambler based upon the tracked information
  • explaining that the purpose of a player’s card is to track the gambler’s betting history and that casinos “comp” a gambler based upon the tracked information
  • same, but also noting that creditor must prove that it actually relied on alleged misrepresentation
  • same, but also noting that creditor must prove that it actually relied on alleged misrepresentation
  • same, but also noting that creditor must prove that it actually relied on alleged misrepresentation
  • “So long as the debtor has an honest, even if unreasonable belief, that he will get lucky at gambling and pay off his debts this Court is satisfied that the debtor has the requisite intent to pay.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bruce Fox

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.