Adair v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• wherein the court concluded that, because the Mississippi search was unlawful under the Fourth Amendment, it did not need to concern *Page 651 itself with the laws of Alabama and Mississippi or the conflicts of law rule

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Daniels v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1985-11-26· cited 48×
• Murray v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1980-11-25· cited 15×
• Ex Parte McCrary
  Supreme Court of Alabama· 1986-08-29· cited 8×
• McDaniel v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1974-10-29· cited 8×
• Waters v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1978-05-02· cited 8×
• Reid v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1979-10-16· cited 6×
• Clark v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 2009-08-07· cited 1×
• Hanvey v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1979-01-30· cited 1×

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Silverthorne Lumber Co. v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1920-03-01· cited 2,373×
• Carnley v. Cochran
  Supreme Court· 1962-04-30· cited 1,897×
• See v. City of Seattle
  Supreme Court· 1967-06-05· cited 1,228×
• Go-Bart Importing Co. v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1931-01-05· cited 885×
• Duncan v. State
  Supreme Court of Alabama· 1965-06-30· cited 230×
• The People v. Saiken
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1971-10-04· cited 94×
• Knox v. State
  Alabama Court of Appeals· 1964-12-15· cited 60×
• Whistenant v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1973-02-20· cited 22×
• Constantine v. Constantine
  Supreme Court of Alabama· 1954-05-13· cited 19×
• Brown v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1971-09-14· cited 8×
• Louisville & N. R. Co. v. Outlaw
  Alabama Court of Appeals· 1951-10-23· cited 8×