Ada Van Harken v. City of Chicago

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that Chicago’s system, which-provided only one level of administrative hearing before appeal to the state courts, was sufficient
• stating that even when \an administrative or adjudicative body derives a financial benefit from fines or penalties that it imposes is not in general a violation of due process\
• noting that the decision addresses litigants who “bypass the appellate remedy that the state has provided in its own courts by filing an action in federal district court instead”
• finding less process was due where maximum possible penalty for parking violation was \only $100\
• rejecting due process challenge to parking ticket re‐ gime because it allowed for administrative and judicial re‐ view
• finding Rooker-Feldman doctrine did not apply to a city’s administrative decision to adopt new procedures for adjudication of parking violations

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).