Ad Visor, Inc. v. Pacific Telephone And Telegraph Company

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the key to the “sham exception” is an improper interference with administrative or judicial processes
• “The cases following Noerr and Pennington show the ‘sham’ exception to be a test of whether the efforts to obtain judicial or legislative action can be characterized as an abuse of process.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).