A.D. v. State of Hawaii Department of Education

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that, because every 20–year–old challenger to a statutory limit to special education eligibility will age out within 14 two years, \[t]he litigation window might never stay open long enough to resolve whether such students are entitled to stay-put injunctions.\
• stating that “a student who requests an administrative due process hearing is entitled to remain in his educational placement regardless of the strength of his case or the likelihood he will be harmed by a change in placement”
• “[A] stay-put placement'is effective from the date a student requests an administrative due process hearing.”
• “[T]he purpose of the stay-put provision ... is to protect students from changes to their educational programs when there is a dispute over the lawfulness of the changes.”
• “[A] stay put order is appealable under the collateral order doctrine[.]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).