AD, LLC v. Paramo

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• providing that the party claiming coverage has the burden of proving coverage under policy
• explaining that the Court’s \objective when interpreting insurance contracts is to ascertain and give effect to the intentions of the parties as reflected in the terms of the insuring contract\ (emphasis added) (internal quotation marks omitted)
• interpreting additional insured endorsement naming contractor as additional insured to provide coverage to contractor only in instances of contractor’s vicarious liability for subcontractor’s negligent acts or omissions
• \[W]e will not 'read an ambiguity into the plain language of a policy in order to provide coverage.' \
• “It is well-established ‘that the burden of proof rests upon the party claiming coverage under an insurance policy.’”
• “[W]hen determining if an ambiguity truly exists we read the policy as a whole, and will fastidiously guard against the invitation to create ambiguities where none exist.” (citations and internal quotation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).