AD HOC Telecommunications Users Committee v. Federal Communications Commission

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that agency decisions implicating “competing policy choices . . . and predictive market judgments” warrant particular deference
• emphasizing our “particularly deferential” review in cases that “implicate competing policy choices”
• arbitrary and capricious “standard is particularly deferential in matters such as this, which implicate competing policy choices, technical expertise, and predictive market judgments” (citations omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).