ACUMED LLC v. Stryker Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming permanent injunction, even where patent owner had granted licenses to other entities, because \[a]dding a new [direct] competitor to the market may create an irreparable harm that the prior licenses did not\
• “[I]nfringement may cause a patentee irreparable harm not remediable by a reasonable royalty.”
• “[I]nfringement may cause a patentee irreparable harm not remediable by a reasonable royalty.”
• “[I]nfringement may cause a patentee irreparable harm not remediable by a reasonable royalty.”
• “[I]nfringement may cause a patentee irreparable harm not remediable by a reasonable royalty.”
• “[I]nfringement may cause a patentee irreparable harm not remediable by a reasonable royalty.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

49 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• I4i Ltd. Partnership v. Microsoft Corp.
  Federal Circuit· 2010-03-10· cited 374×
• Robert Bosch LLC v. Pylon Manufacturing Corp.
  Federal Circuit· 2011-10-12· cited 138×
• Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
  Federal Circuit· 2013-11-18· cited 74×
• Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
  Federal Circuit· 2015-12-16· cited 65×
• Tek Global, S.R.L., Tek Corp. v. Sealant Sys. Int'l, Inc.
  Federal Circuit· 2019-03-29· cited 65×
• Tex. Advanced Optoelectronic Solutions, Inc. v. Renesas Elecs. Am., Inc.
  Federal Circuit· 2018-05-01· cited 57×
• Universal Electronics, Inc. v. Universal Remote Control, Inc.
  C.D. California· 2013-05-02· cited 49×
• PersonalWeb Technologies, LLC v. Apple Inc.
  N.D. California· 2014-09-24· cited 45×
• Matt Martin Real Estate Management LLC v. United States
  Federal Claims· 2010-12-02· cited 27×
• Clinicomp International, Inc. v. United States
  Federal Claims· 2014-08-01· cited 24×
• Glenn Defense Marine (Asia), PTE Ltd. v. United States
  Federal Claims· 2011-04-08· cited 19×
• Nichia Corporation v. Everlight Americas, Inc.
  Federal Circuit· 2017-04-28· cited 15×
• Northeast Military Sales, Inc. v. United States
  Federal Claims· 2011-05-31· cited 14×
• Belden Technologies Inc. v. Superior Essex Communications LP
  D. Delaware· 2011-08-12· cited 13×
• Homesource Real Estate Asset Services, Inc. v. United States
  Federal Claims· 2010-08-25· cited 13×
• Enpat, Inc. v. Budnic
  M.D. Florida· 2011-02-28· cited 12×
• Gear Wizzard, Inc. v. United States
  Federal Claims· 2011-06-16· cited 12×
• Apple, Inc. v. Motorola, Inc.
  N.D. Illinois· 2012-06-22· cited 12×
• I4i Ltd. Partnership v. Microsoft Corp.
  Federal Circuit· 2009-12-22· cited 9×
• Acoustic Processing Technology, Inc. v. KDH Electronic System Inc.
  D. Maine· 2010-03-19· cited 8×

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Provenz v. Miller
  Ninth Circuit· 1996-09-11· cited 384×
• Innogenetics, N v. v. Abbott Laboratories
  Federal Circuit· 2008-01-17· cited 199×
• Acumed LLC v. Stryker Corporation
  Federal Circuit· 2007-04-12· cited 130×
• Anchor Wall Systems, Inc. v. Rockwood Retaining Walls, Inc., Gls Industries, Inc., Equipment, Inc., Raymond R. Price, and Gerald P. Price
  Federal Circuit· 2003-10-07· cited 105×
• Kathy Bliesner v. The Communication Workers of America Verizon Northwest Inc., Fka Gte Northwest Incorporated
  Ninth Circuit· 2006-09-13· cited 45×
• TiVo Inc. v. Echostar Communications Corp.
  E.D. Texas· 2006-08-17· cited 20×
• Smith & Nephew, Inc. v. Synthes (U.S.A.)
  W.D. Tennessee· 2006-09-28· cited 17×

Other cases named ACUMED LLC v. Stryker Corp.

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

• ACUMED LLC v. Stryker Corp.
  Federal Circuit· 2008-05-13· cited 81×
• Acumed LLC v. Stryker Corp.
  Federal Circuit· 2007-06-12