Skip to main content
Federal & State Lawfederalstatelaw.com
Home/Federal/Cases
Federal Claims· 2/6/2017

Active Network, LLC v. United States

Citations

  • 130 Fed. Cl. 421
  • 2017 U.S. Claims LEXIS 98
  • 2017 WL 587239

Syllabus

REPORTED OPINION. Remand Report due by 3/8/2017. Signed by Judge Thomas C. Wheeler.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding mere disagreements with an agency’s past performance evaluation fail to establish that the agency acted unreasonably
  • protestor’s disparate treatment claim failed where the other offeror’s proposal contained meaningful differences and was “sufficiently more detailed and comprehensive” than the protestor’s proposal
  • “When reviewing an evaluation of past performance in a negotiated procurement, the Court affords an agency, ‘the greatest deference possible.’”
  • “Without a price realism analysis in the record, the Court has nothing to review and no way of determining whether Active was prejudiced. This conclusion alone is sufficient to warrant remand to conduct a proper price realism analysis.”
  • “Without a price realism analysis in the record, the Court has nothing to review and no way of determining whether Active was prejudiced. This conclusion alone is sufficient to warrant remand to conduct a proper price realism analysis.”
  • “Without a price realism analysis in the record, the Court has nothing to review and no way of determining whether [the protestor] was prejudiced. This conclusion alone is sufficient to warrant remand to conduct a proper price realism analysis.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Thomas C. Wheeler

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

22 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.