· 3/29/2005
Action Outdoor Advertising JV, L.L.C. v. Town of Shalimar
Citations
- 377 F. Supp. 2d 1178
- 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18581
- 2005 WL 1690591
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “following Metromedia courts in the Eleventh Circuit have uniformly found the promotion of safety or aesthetics to constitute substantial government interests”
- third Central Hudson prong satisfied where record contains no evidence suggesting that ordinance fails to directly advance municipality’s legitimate goals, such that there is no basis for court to disagree with judgment of defendant’s local lawmakers
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Rodgers
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.