Skip to main content
· 3/29/2005

Action Outdoor Advertising JV, L.L.C. v. Town of Shalimar

Citations

  • 377 F. Supp. 2d 1178
  • 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18581
  • 2005 WL 1690591

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “following Metromedia courts in the Eleventh Circuit have uniformly found the promotion of safety or aesthetics to constitute substantial government interests”
  • third Central Hudson prong satisfied where record contains no evidence suggesting that ordinance fails to directly advance municipality’s legitimate goals, such that there is no basis for court to disagree with judgment of defendant’s local lawmakers

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rodgers

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.