Action on Smoking and Health v. Civil Aeronautics Board

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that “[b]ald assertions” are insufficient to show good cause
• new round of comments required where record was two-to-four years old and likelihood of new information was large
• “If one rulemaking proceeding has culminated and another has begun, then new notice and comment procedures are required.”
• “Bald assertions that the agency does not believe comments would be useful cannot create good cause to forgo notice and comment procedures.”
• new round of comments required where record was two-to-four years old and likelihood of new information was large
• “If one rulemaking proceeding has culminated and another has begun, then new notice and comment procedures are required.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).