Skip to main content
· 2/2/2001

Acterna, L.L.C. v. Adtech, Inc.

Citations

  • 129 F. Supp. 2d 936
  • 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4779
  • 2001 WL 101775

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the preferred forum in a patent infringement action 1s that which is “the center of the accused activity”
  • finding that, although the inventors of the plaintiffs patent were located in Virginia and Maryland, such did not overcome the fact that the center of accused activity was in Hawaii
  • affording the plaintiff's choice of forum “very slight weight” where sales were not “unique to Virginia”
  • giving little weight to the presence of the plaintiffs non-party witnesses in or near the forum because the plaintiff did not show why it would need live testimony or why de bene esse depositions were inadequate

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Jackson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.