· 2/2/2001
Acterna, L.L.C. v. Adtech, Inc.
Citations
- 129 F. Supp. 2d 936
- 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4779
- 2001 WL 101775
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the preferred forum in a patent infringement action 1s that which is “the center of the accused activity”
- finding that, although the inventors of the plaintiffs patent were located in Virginia and Maryland, such did not overcome the fact that the center of accused activity was in Hawaii
- affording the plaintiff's choice of forum “very slight weight” where sales were not “unique to Virginia”
- giving little weight to the presence of the plaintiffs non-party witnesses in or near the forum because the plaintiff did not show why it would need live testimony or why de bene esse depositions were inadequate
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Jackson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.