Acridge v. Evangelical Lutheran Good Samaritan Society

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that “no single factor is determinative” of citizenship
• \The general rule is that a person has only one domicile at a particular time.\
• “A person acquires a ‘domicile of origin’ at birth, and this domicile is presumed to continue absent sufficient evidence of change.”
• “There is a presumption of continuing domicile that applies whenever a person relocates. In order to defeat the presumption and establish a new domicile (the ‘domicile of choice’), the person must demonstrate both (1) residence in a new state, and (2
• “There is a presumption of continuing domicile that applies whenever a person relocates. In order to defeat the presumption and establish a new domicile (the ‘domicile of choice’), the person must demonstrate both (1) residence in a new state, and (2

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).