Acquisto v. Joe R. Hahn Enterprises, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting claim that clause should be interpreted as mandating that landlord supply insurance on premises and that tenant was responsible for negligence
• “In the absence of an agreement between the parties specifying which of them will carry fire insurance for the benefit of both parties, or an express clause in the lease relieving a party from his negligence, each party must bear the risk of loss for his own negligence.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).