Acosta v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the court need not determine whether Hearns should apply retroactively because Perkins was always the controlling authority

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Brinson v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-11-14· cited 9×
• Kalogeras v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2011-02-11· cited 2×

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Witt v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1980-07-24· cited 342×
• State v. Hearns
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2007-04-26· cited 186×
• Perkins v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1991-03-14· cited 149×
• State v. Barnum
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2006-02-09· cited 47×
• Johnson v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-09-03· cited 13×