Skip to main content
· 1/25/2006

Acosta v. Potter

Citations

  • 410 F. Supp. 2d 298
  • 180 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2564
  • 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2550

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[I]n a hybrid claim, if the employer is not liable to the employee, neither is the union.”
  • “[A] suit in which an employee alleges that an employer has breached a CBA and that a union has breached its duty of fair representation [under NLRA] by failing to enforce the CBA is known as a ‘hybrid § 301/fair representation claim.’” (citations omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Mukasey

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.