· 1/25/2006
Acosta v. Potter
Citations
- 410 F. Supp. 2d 298
- 180 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2564
- 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2550
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[I]n a hybrid claim, if the employer is not liable to the employee, neither is the union.”
- “[A] suit in which an employee alleges that an employer has breached a CBA and that a union has breached its duty of fair representation [under NLRA] by failing to enforce the CBA is known as a ‘hybrid § 301/fair representation claim.’” (citations omitted)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Mukasey
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.