Skip to main content
· 3/30/1964

Acosta v. Burris

Citations

  • 197 N.E.2d 757
  • 47 Ill. App. 2d 201
  • 1964 Ill. App. LEXIS 659

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[W]here a defendant has not been served with process, the court has no jurisdiction to enter a judgment against him. A sheriff’s return is prima facie proof of service and can be overcome only by clear and convincing proof.” (citations and internal quotation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Murphy, Burman, Kluczynski

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.