Skip to main content
· 6/30/1925

Acorn Refining Co. v. Commissioner

Citations

  • 2 B.T.A. 253
  • 1925 BTA LEXIS 2491

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding no prejudice when late-filed findings and conclusions were consistent with the trial court's oral ruling
  • finding no prejudice when late-filed findings and conclusions were consistent with the trial court’s oral ruling
  • finding no prejudice when late-filed 4 No. 49481-7-II findings and conclusions were consistent with the trial court’s oral ruling
  • no interjection of new facts and thus no prejudice caused by delay in producing deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA
  • no interjection of new facts and thus no prejudice caused by delay in producing deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA
  • \ Dismissal of a case for discovery abuse is an extraordinary remedy that is generally available only when the defendant has been prejudiced by the prosecution' s actions. \

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: James, Littleton, Trussell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.