Skip to main content
E.D. Missouri· 12/23/1981

Acord v. United States

Citations

  • 532 F. Supp. 22

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • analyzing whether the defendant “knowingly benefitted” as the 23 first element and whether it “participated in a venture which it knew or should have known 24 engaged in sex trafficking” as the second element

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cahill

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.