E.D. Missouri· 12/23/1981
Acord v. United States
Citations
- 532 F. Supp. 22
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- analyzing whether the defendant “knowingly benefitted” as the 23 first element and whether it “participated in a venture which it knew or should have known 24 engaged in sex trafficking” as the second element
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Cahill
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.