Skip to main content
· 5/7/1932

Acock v. Kansas City Power & Light Co.

Citations

  • 135 Kan. 389
  • 10 P.2d 877
  • 1932 Kan. LEXIS 222

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that insurer's offer to pay policy limits, conditioned on a full release of the defendants, was insufficient to stop the running of post-judgment interest
  • insurer’s offer to pay policy limits, conditioned on full release of defendants, insufficient to toll running of postjudgment interest

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Harvey

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.