Skip to main content
· 10/21/1994

Acme Markets, Inc. v. Federal Armored Express, Inc.

Citations

  • 648 A.2d 1218
  • 437 Pa. Super. 41
  • 1994 Pa. Super. LEXIS 2914

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • discussing how the trial court erroneously believed its analysis ended upon concluding that the condition was not met, instead of continuing in the analysis by applying section 229 to determine if the non-occurrence of the condition may be excused
  • “a condition precedent may be defined as a condition which must occur before a duty to perform under a contract arises.”
  • “[A] condition precedent may be defined as a condition which must occur before a duty to perform under a contract arises.”
  • “A condition precedent is a condition ‘that must occur before a 8 duty to perform under a contract arises’” and failure of a condition precedent provides the party with an excuse for non-performance

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Beck, Hudock and Hester

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.