· 9/2/1899
Acme Harvester Co. v. Butterfield
Citations
- 12 S.D. 91
- 80 N.W. 170
- 1899 S.D. LEXIS 86
Syllabus
<p>1. An unauthorized change in a note of the place of payment by the payee’s clerk, subsequently erased, leaving note as in the first place, will not prevent recovery.</p> <p>2. Demand for payment of note secured by clattel mortgage is not necessary prior to action by the payee to recover possession of the chattels.</p>
Judges: Haney
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.