Acme Galvanizing Co. v. Fireman's Fund Insurance

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• discussing ensuing loss provisions and finding no peril separate and in addition to the initial excluded peril, precluding coverage
• ‘We interpret the ensuing loss provision to apply to the situation where there is a “peril,” i.e., a hazard or occurrence which causes a loss or injury, separate and independent....”
• “We interpret the 4 ensuing loss provision to apply to the situation where there is a ‘peril,’ i.e., a hazard or occurrence which causes a loss or injury, separate and independent but resulting from the original excluded 5 peril[.]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).