· 7/11/2022
Ackley v. Haney
Citations
- 2022 Ohio 2382
Syllabus
The juvenile court did not err in terminating the shared parenting plan and naming Mother residential parent and legal custodian where the record reflects that the parties were no longer able to agree to shared parenting.
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that “ ‘[b]asket’ or re sidual provisions of HTSUS Headings ... are intended as a broad catch-all to encompass the classification of articles for which there is no more specifically applicable subheading”
- “ ‘Basket’ or residual provisions of HTSUS Headings ... are intended as a broad catch-all to encompass the classification of articles for which there is not a more specifically applicable subheading.”
- “basket” or “residual” provisions are intended as broad catch-all tariff terms for which “there [are] no more specifically applicable subheadings.”
- “ ‘Basket’ or residual provisions of HTSUS Headings ... are intended as a broad catch-all to encompass the classification of articles for which there is no more specifically applicable subheading.”
- “Basket or residual provisions of HTSUS Headings ... are intended as a broad catch-all to encompass the classification of articles for which there is no more specifically applicable subheading.”
- “‘Basket’ or residual provisions of HTSUS Headings ... are intended as a broad catch-all to encompass the classification of articles for which there is no more specifically applicable subheading.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Piper
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.